The 2023 American Association for Thoracic Surgery Expert Consensus
Document on the Management of Subsolid Lung Nodules provides
answers…and more questions
WABIP Newsletter
J A N U A R Y 2 0 2 5 V O L U M E 1 3 , I S S U E 1
EXECUTIVE BOARD
Pyng Lee, MD, PhD
Singapore, Chair
Ali Musani, MD
USA, Vice-Chair
Stefano Gasparini, MD
Italy, Immediate Past-Chair
Hind Janah, MD
Morocco, Membership
Committee Chair
Aleš Rozman, MD, PhD
Slovenia, Education Com-
mittee Chair
Danai Khemasuwan, MD
USA, Finance Committee
Chair
Naofumi Shinagawa, MD
Japan, Secretary General
Rajesh Thomas, MD, PhD
Melbourne , President
WCBIP 2026
STAFF
Michael Mendoza
General Manager
Judy McConnell
Administrator
Kazuhiro Yasufuku
Newsletter Editor-in-chief
P A G E 2
An increase in the utilization of Chest CT imaging,
both for lung cancer screening and other indications,
has identified an increasing number of subsolid lung
nodules. Although the majority of these nodules
represent benign disease, a significant number are
found to be malignancies; specifically, lesions in the
early spectrum of lung adenocarcinoma. Biologically,
these radiographically subsolid lung cancers tend to
exhibit more indolent behavior and patient out-
comes are better as compared to radiographically
solid lung cancers. However, these lesions can also
represent invasive pathologies that have the poten-
tial to metastasize. As a result, the management of
subsolid lung adenocarcinomas requires a
thoughul balance of early intervention for curable
lesions while avoiding overtreatment of lesions that
may never impact an individual’s survival. The re-
cently published 2023 American Association for Tho-
racic Surgery expert consensus document (ECD) on
the management of subsolid nodules
1
aims to pro-
vide clinicians with guidelines to help with this nu-
anced decision-making, but also makes clear that
many questions still remain.
The ECD begins with a definition of terminology,
which may be one of the most important messages
of the entire document. Subsolid refers to a CT-
identified focal ground-glass opacity (GGO) with vari-
able solid components within which the presence of
underlying pulmonary vessels or bronchial struc-
tures remain visible, serving as an umbrella term for
any lung nodule that is not considered solid. The
subsolid category is then broken down into two sub-
categories: non-solid (also known as pure GGO) and
part-solid.
1
There is significant heterogeneity in how subsol-
id lung nodules are described in the literature, with some
broadly using the term “GGO” to refer to any subsolid lung
nodule as well as those who describe subsolid lesions based
on the consolidation/tumor ratio (CTR). For future research,
it will be important to encourage greater uniformity in the
language used to describe subsolid lung nodules for better
communication and more efficient scientific progress.
Another important topic that was addressed in the ECD is
the duration of surveillance for subsolid lung nodules. Stud-
ies have shown that subsolid lung nodules may remain sta-
ble for many years prior to growing in size or density. For
example, Lee et al performed long-term follow up of pa-
tients that had subsolid lung nodules that were already
demonstrated to be stable over the course of five years.
After an additional five years of surveillance (more than 10
years in total), 13% of nodules progressed.
2
As a result, the
ECD recommends that subsolid lesions that are stable for
five years are followed for at least ten years. This does po-
tentially create a long-term burden for patients, clinicians,
and health systems as a whole, and increases the demand
for multi-disciplinary lung nodule programs to streamline
care and optimize follow-up while providing expert recom-
mendations.
3,4
In addition, future research to discover
methods of predicting lung nodule behavior over time will
be critical.
The ECD also provides recommendations for the specific
staging of non-solid/pure ground glass lung nodules, a topic
of immediate practical importance. Studies suggest that
PET/CT and Brain MRI are unlikely to play a role in the pre-
operative work-up of pure GGOs, which have an essentially
non-existent risk for metastasis.
5,6
By extension, invasive
Jane Yanagawa, MD
Associate Professor of Thoracic Surgery ,
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)