a lack of PCP commitment to LCS.
5
Planning also requires the support
of local leadership and a business
model that includes funding for a
nurse navigator and database devel-
opment or soware plaorm to
manage and track screened pa-
ents, nodules detected, and allows
for data reporng to an accredited
registry. The implementaon phase
should emphasize how to ensure
that screening is only performed in
appropriate individuals, how to per-
form shared decision making and
incorporate tobacco cessaon, the
process for following up abnormal
ndings, and adherence to repeat
imaging. Lastly, maintaining the pro-
gram should involve reviewing quali-
ty metrics and registry data to en-
sure it is operang as intended.
In conclusion, implemenng LCS has
many moving parts with challenges
that may vary based on locally avail-
able resources and enthusiasm for
screening, but it absolutely can be
done. To develop and implement a
program that is eecve and safe
involves buy in from many dierent
disciplines and services. A carefully
planned approach with a focus on
the essenal components for LCS
will do much to ensure a successful
program start and uptake. Finally,
connuing review of system and
paent level outcomes is important
for quality assessment and future
adaptaons of the program.
References
1. Aberle DR et al. N Engl J Med.
2011;365(5):395-409.
2. Bach PB et al. JAMA. 2012;307
(22):2418-29.
3. Mazzone P et al. Chest. 2015;147
(2):295-303.
4. Wiener RS et al. Am J Respir Crit Care
Med. 2015;192(7):881-91.
5. Gesthalter YB et al. Chest. 2017
Nichole T. Tanner,
MD, MSCR
Associate Professor of
Medicine
Co-Director, Lung Cancer
Screening Program
Medical University of
South Carolina
Core invesgator and Lung Cancer Screening
Director
Health Equity and Rural Outreach Innovaon
Center (HEROIC)
Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Aairs Hospital
Six years ago the landmark Naonal
Lung Screening Trial (NLST) was pub-
lished demonstrang a mortality
benet to screening asymptomac
individuals at high risk based on age
and smoking history with annual low
-dose computed tomography
(LDCT).
1
The number needed to
screen to prevent one death from
lung cancer was 320; a number simi-
lar to that for mammography in
women 60 and older. The NLST also
demonstrated a high number of false
posive results with LDCT screening
with approximately 1 in 4 paents
having a screen detected nodule. The
vast majority of these nodules (96%)
were not malignant in nature and
the potenal risk of downstream
invasive tesng for benign disease
along with paent anxiety gave many
pause to recommend widespread
implementaon of lung cancer
screening.
2
It wasn’t unl 2013 that the United
States Preventave Services Task
Force gave a lung cancer screening
(LCS) with LDCT a grade B recom-
mendaon for high risk individuals.
Following this recommendaon,
broad uptake of LCS did not occur as
many sll had concerns about the
best way to implement LCS and in-
surers were largely not providing
coverage. In March 2016, close to 5
years aer the publicaon of the
NLST, the Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services (CMS) approved
coverage for lung cancer screening
for its eligible beneciaries, however
nong the potenal risks, a paent
shared-decision making visit was
mandated prior to LDCT; the rst for
any cancer screening test.
Implemenng lung cancer screening
has become much more than adver-
sing and a scanner; professional
sociees cauon that LCS should be
conducted in a muldisciplinary and
comprehensive program that incor-
porates experse in pulmonary nod-
ule management as well as tobacco
treatment services. In a joint policy
statement, the American College of
Chest Physicians and the American
Thoracic society recommend nine
programmac components to ensure
that LCS is conducted eecvely, with
quality, and safety.
3
These compo-
nents include standardized protocols
for performing LDCT, reporng re-
sults, and pulmonary nodule evalua-
on. Paent eligibility, frequency and
duraon for LCS comprise as well as
paent and provider educaon are
addional components.
While these essenal components
provide an ideal framework for im-
plementaon, the real-world logiscs
of starng a LCS program can be com-
plicated. The ACCP and ATS outline
strategies for the successful imple-
mentaon LDCT screening programs
into clinical pracce in a separate
policy statement.
4
These praccal
approaches are categorized into
three phases: planning, implementa-
on, and maintenance of LCS. The
planning phase should be guided by a
muldisciplinary steering commiee
that includes engagement and educa-
on of primary care providers. Evalu-
aons of early-adopng LCS pro-
grams at three unique centers sug-
gests that failure to do so resulted in
Guest Opinion/Editorial
WABIP Newsletter
M A Y 2 0 1 7 V O L U M E 5 , I S S U E 2
EXECUTIVE BOARD
Zsolt Papai MD
Székesfehérvár, Hun-
gary
Chair
Silvia Quadrelli MD
Buenos Aires, Argen-
na
Vice-chair
Hideo Saka MD
Nagoya, Japan
Secretary General
Hojoong Kim MD
Seoul, Korea
Treasurer
Eric Edell MD
Rochester MN, USA
President WCBIP 2018
Quangfa Wang MD
Beijing, China
President WCBIP 2020
Henri Colt MD
Laguna Beach, CA
Immediate Past-chair
STAFF
Michael Mendoza
General Manager
Judy McConnell
Administrator
Kazuhiro Yasufuku
Newsleer Editor-in-
chief
P A G E 2
How to set up a lung cancer screening program: more than a glossy brochure and a CT scanner